Get Instant Visibility into Internet Outages Affecting Your Sites. Try Internet Sonar for Free

Menu:

Save Test Results with a Free Account Sign Up & Save Test Result

Webpage Performance Test Result

Screenshot

View:

Tools:

Export

Performance Summary

Jump to Opportunities by Category:

Is it Quick? Needs Improvement.

This site was quick to connect and deliver initial code. It began rendering content with little delay. There were 52 render-blocking requests. The largest content rendered later than ideal.

  • Opportunities 10
  • Tips 10
  • Pro Experiments 13

Is it Usable? Not bad...

This site had major layout shifts. It took a long time to become interactive. Some HTML was generated after delivery, potentially delaying usability.

  • Opportunities 2
  • Tips 2
  • Pro Experiments 2

Is it Resilient? Not bad...

This site had no render-blocking 3rd party requests that could be a single point of failure. It had no security issues. Some HTML was generated after delivery, which can cause fragility.

  • Opportunities 1
  • Tips 1
  • Pro Experiments 3

You have Free Experiments Available! Try them now!

Page Performance Metrics (Based on Median Run by:
Start Render
)

Note: Metric availability will vary

Please note: Availability of metrics will vary based on the browser being tested. Also, the way a site performs in some conditions may not predict how well it will perform in others, so we encourage testing in a variety of browsers, devices, & locations.

First View (Run 2)
Time to First Byte Start Render First Contentful Paint Speed Index Largest Contentful Paint Cumulative Layout Shift Total Blocking Time Page Weight
.805S 3.400S 4.544S 24.002S 14.250S 1.001 2.848S 20,263KB
When did the content start downloading? When did pixels first start to appear? How soon did text and images start to appear? How soon did the page look usable? When did the largest visible content finish loading? How much did the design shift while loading? Was the main thread blocked? How many bytes downloaded?

Visual Page Loading Process (Explore)

Repeat View (Run 2)
Time to First Byte Start Render First Contentful Paint Speed Index Largest Contentful Paint Cumulative Layout Shift Total Blocking Time Page Weight
.817S 2.100S 4.627S 5.598S 6.336S 1.235 2.933S 18,680KB
When did the content start downloading? When did pixels first start to appear? How soon did text and images start to appear? How soon did the page look usable? When did the largest visible content finish loading? How much did the design shift while loading? Was the main thread blocked? How many bytes downloaded?

Visual Page Loading Process (Explore)

Compare First ViewsCompare Repeat ViewsPlot Full Results

Real-World Usage Metrics

Compare this WebPageTest run with browser-collected performance data for this site.

(Collected anonymously by Chrome browser from June 9, 2024 to July 6, 2024 | Full Report)

First Contentful Paint (FCP)

4.05S (poor)

At 75th percentile of visits.

  • 35%
  • 28%
  • 37%

.49S better than this WPT test run's first view (4.54S). Why?

Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)

6.20S (poor)

At 75th percentile of visits.

  • 35%
  • 24%
  • 41%

8.05S better than this WPT test run's first view (14.25S). Why?

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)

1.28 (poor)

At 75th percentile of visits.

  • 5%
  • 1%
  • 95%

0.279 worse than this WPT test run's first view (1.001). Why?

Time to First Byte (TTFB)

.54S (good)

At 75th percentile of visits.

  • 85%
  • 10%
  • 5%

.27S better than this WPT test run's first view (.81S). Why?

Interaction to Next Paint (INP)

.31S (fair)

At 75th percentile of visits.

  • 60%
  • 27%
  • 13%

Field metric only, no WPT test run data.

Note: Why can real browser usage metrics vary from test run metrics?

Variance between your test run and real world usage is expected because a WebPageTest run uses a specific connection speed, and real world data spans all connection speeds. To closely match the p75 user in WebPageTest, try rerunning your test using a different connection speed.

Save Test Results with a Free Account Sign Up & Save Test Result