Current time: 08-09-2020, 03:41 AM Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Akamai Versus NetDNA/MaxCDN
10-18-2011, 03:23 AM (This post was last modified: 10-18-2011 03:28 AM by jarrod1937.)
Post: #4
RE: Akamai Versus NetDNA/MaxCDN
Ok, after a string of DNS issues (on our end), I was finally able to get to the whole site testing. Interestingly, while the TCP stack differences were noticeable in individual testing, I found them to be inconsequential in the whole site testing. This is mostly because the TCP connection is reused, not closed each time, so I found that difference had little effect overall. Below is the speed differences from a few tests:

Kansas City, MO - IE8 - DSL

MaxCDN
Load Time: 2.852 seconds
First Byte: 0.334 seconds
http://www.webpagetest.org/result/111017_AE_1XD76/

Akamai
Load Time: 2.280 seconds
First Byte: 0.334 seconds
http://www.webpagetest.org/result/111017_8X_1XDB8/

Load Time Difference: 0.572 seconds in favor of Akamai


San Jose, CA - IE8 - DSL

MaxCDN
Load Time: 2.681 seconds
First Byte: 0.354 seconds
http://www.webpagetest.org/result/111017_JA_1XDMN/

Akamai
Load Time: 2.069 seconds
First Byte: 0.351 seconds
http://www.webpagetest.org/result/111017_6E_1XDKZ/

Load Time Difference: 0.612 seconds in favor of Akamai


Montreal, Canada - IE8 - DSL

MaxCDN
Load Time: 2.945 seconds
First Byte: 0.293 seconds
http://www.webpagetest.org/result/111017_PE_1XESB/

Akamai
Load Time: 2.903 seconds
First Byte: 0.329 seconds
http://www.webpagetest.org/result/111017_JK_1XESZ/

Load Time Difference: 0.042 seconds in favor of Akamai. The difference here is small, but the start render time is 0.204 seconds faster on the Akamai test, though it is hard to tell if this improvement is because of Akamai or not.

I'm still testing, i'll keep everyone updated.

Edit: Ignore the cache static content rating, for testing I have the expiration date set to access+24 hours. Also, there is a small difference between transferred bytes, I think this is Akamai serving the css and js files with slightly better compression.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
Akamai Versus NetDNA/MaxCDN - jarrod1937 - 10-13-2011, 01:49 AM
RE: Akamai Versus NetDNA/MaxCDN - pmeenan - 10-13-2011, 01:57 AM
RE: Akamai Versus NetDNA/MaxCDN - jarrod1937 - 10-18-2011 03:23 AM
RE: Akamai Versus NetDNA/MaxCDN - Marvin - 10-18-2011, 03:50 AM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)