Akamai Versus NetDNA/MaxCDN
|
10-13-2011, 01:49 AM
(This post was last modified: 10-13-2011 01:51 AM by jarrod1937.)
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
Akamai Versus NetDNA/MaxCDN
Here is some preliminary testing between MaxCDN and Akamai:
54 KB file, San Jose CA, IE8, 1.5 Megabit DSL Akamai Load Time: 0.516 seconds First Byte: 0.180 seconds http://www.webpagetest.org/result/111012_S0_1W1RF/ MaxCDN Load Time: 0.498 seconds First Byte: 0.186 seconds http://www.webpagetest.org/result/111012_8B_1W1NW/ 4 KB file, San Jose CA, IE8, 1.5 Megabit DSL Akamai Load Time: 0.214 seconds First Byte: 0.176 seconds http://www.webpagetest.org/result/111012_M6_1W1SF/ MaxCDN Load Time: 0.232 seconds First Byte: 0.188 seconds http://www.webpagetest.org/result/111012_5M_1W1XW/ I've tested at different location and the results are pretty similar. The interesting thing is that Akamai seems to almost always do slightly worse than MaxCDN when it comes to total load time, despite Akamai having the better time to first byte. Though the 4KB file shows Akamai having a better load time. I'll keep everyone updated, I have to add some more cnames and I'll be doing web page speed tests. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Akamai Versus NetDNA/MaxCDN - jarrod1937 - 10-13-2011 01:49 AM
RE: Akamai Versus NetDNA/MaxCDN - pmeenan - 10-13-2011, 01:57 AM
RE: Akamai Versus NetDNA/MaxCDN - jarrod1937 - 10-13-2011, 02:15 AM
RE: Akamai Versus NetDNA/MaxCDN - jarrod1937 - 10-18-2011, 03:23 AM
RE: Akamai Versus NetDNA/MaxCDN - Marvin - 10-18-2011, 03:50 AM
RE: Akamai Versus NetDNA/MaxCDN - jarrod1937 - 10-18-2011, 04:01 AM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)